Loving What Is

Posted in What I'm Reading on July 29th, 2010 by Raymond Gleason

Most of the books I read can be eas­ily cat­e­go­rized: “it’s a busi­ness book”…”it’s a cook­book”… “it’s a book about God”… “its a book about how to bud­get bet­ter.” I come across very few books I would con­sider to be uni­ver­sal in appli­ca­tion. These books cut across all dis­ci­plines. They appeal to a larger audi­ence. The lessons they teach can be applied to all dimen­sions of life.

When I dis­cover a book that has uni­ver­sal appeal, wis­dom, AND it comes from the life expe­ri­ences and pain of Byron Katie her­self, well….I want to read it cover to cover.

The book is Lov­ing What Is: 4 Ques­tions That Can Change Your Life, by Byron Katie and Stephen Mitchell. What do I appre­ci­ate about this book?

First, I love the raw sim­plic­ity. In par­tic­u­lar, I value an author who is able to — from their own con­vo­luted, messed up, chaotic life — draw out deep insights that are not just sim­ple, they are pro­foundly simple.

Sec­ond, this book is very well writ­ten. By “well writ­ten,” I mean that each sen­tence is built upon the pre­ced­ing sen­tence, so you can fol­low the author’s think­ing. There­fore, you do not feel like an idiot because you under­stand their point completely.

Third, I think there is great wis­dom in the premise: it is not the events of our lives, but the sto­ries we hold about these events, that bring us pain. One of the keys to under­stand­ing our own suf­fer­ing is to exam­ine our unex­am­ined beliefs. As the authors say, “Too often it is not the prob­lem that causes our suf­fer­ing; it’s our think­ing about the problem.”

Fourth, Lov­ing What Is does not bom­bard you with a rehash­ing of the “same old, same old.” Rather, the authors dis­till their wis­dom into to four key ques­tions and a “turn­around” (the authors call this “the Work”).

These decep­tively sim­ple ques­tions are:

1. Is it true?
2. Can you absolutely know that it’s true?
3. How do you react when you think that thought?
4. Who would you be with­out the thought?

What I par­tic­u­larly like here is that when you apply “the Work” to a spe­cific prob­lem, it very quickly affords you the oppor­tu­nity to see what is dis­con­cert­ing or upset­ting you in a very holis­tic way.

Once you have responded to these four ques­tions, it is time for what the authors call “the turn­around.” This is con­trar­i­an­ism at its finest!

Turn­arounds are oppor­tu­ni­ties to expe­ri­ence the oppo­site of your orig­i­nal state­ment, to see what you and the one you judge have in com­mon. For exam­ple, “I’m upset with my wife because she doesn’t under­stand me,” can be turned around to “I’m angry at myself because I don’t under­stand me.”

Is that also true, or even truer? Could it be that I don’t under­stand myself, and per­haps that is why I repeat­edly get so upset at my wife? If I don’t under­stand myself, can I see how my wife wouldn’t either? Another turn­around could be “I’m angry at myself because I don’t under­stand my wife.”

I par­tic­u­larly liked the turn­around con­cept because it draws out unique rev­e­la­tions that can show you the unseen pieces of your­self reflected back through others.

There are many other great nuggets through­out this book. I was per­son­ally chal­lenged as I read it, and have found numer­ous con­cepts very help­ful as I have applied them in my coach­ing work.

Related posts:

  1. Amish Par­adise

Leave a Comment